Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://floss.social/users/bkuhn/statuses/114201035037997772">Bradley M. Kuhn (bkuhn@floss.social)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 03:04:14 JST</a><a href="https://floss.social/@bkuhn" title="bkuhn@floss.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/331188-48-20250227020234.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Bradley M. Kuhn" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Bradley M. Kuhn</a><div><a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed/114200926307691597" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/107314" title="ed@social.opensource.org">Stefano Maffulli</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/227593" title="richardfontana@mastodon.social">Richard Fontana</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p>Stefano Maffuli (ED of OSI),</p><p>Your argument supports <a href="https://floss.social/tags/OpenSource" rel="tag">#OpenSource</a> Initiative's position on why <a href="https://mastodon.social/@richardfontana">@richardfontana</a> and I were not appointed. It DOES NOT explain why you tampered w/ ballots to remove our names &amp; refuse to report what the electorate recommended.</p><p><a href="https://social.opensource.org/@osi">@osi</a> was always free to to ignore the electorate; we all know <a href="https://floss.social/tags/OSI" rel="tag">#OSI</a> elections are advisory, not binding.</p><p>Your refusal to engage in public dialogue w/ your electorate also indicates OSI's abilities in consensus building may be lacking.</p><p>Cc <a href="https://social.opensource.org/@ed">@ed</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4771199#notice-9346150">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-22T03:04:14+09:00" title="Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 03:04:14 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://floss.social/@bkuhn/114201035037997772" rel="external" title="Sent from floss.social via ActivityPub">floss.social</a></span></span><a href="https://floss.social/@bkuhn/114201035037997772">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4339542">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Bradley M. Kuhn (bkuhn@floss.social)'s status on Saturday, 22-Mar-2025 03:04:14 JSTBradley M. Kuhn
in reply to
Stefano Maffuli (ED of OSI),
Your argument supports #OpenSource Initiative's position on why @richardfontana and I were not appointed. It DOES NOT explain why you tampered w/ ballots to remove our names & refuse to report what the electorate recommended.
@osi was always free to to ignore the electorate; we all know #OSI elections are advisory, not binding.
Your refusal to engage in public dialogue w/ your electorate also indicates OSI's abilities in consensus building may be lacking.
Cc @ed
In conversationabout 2 months ago from floss.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice