@hopland >made a big letter complaining about Intel not contributing back after the fact.
I've read the letter and in a typical weak licensing fashion, it seems he was only complaining that nobody at intel sent him an email informing him that his software was now taking the freedom of billions of users (it appears he was actually happy that so much freedom was taken, as his OS was the most popular).

Weak licensors and their fetish for popularity at all costs have been a disaster for the human race.

>You could have said that instead of spewing a giant wall of text that I nor anyone else will read.
The problem is that everyone refuses to believes my word, unless I start whipping out evidence and going through it in a big wall of text.

The first 2 sentences summarized the claim quite well and those with doubts can keep reading.