@Hoss @dj @fedilist @koropokkur @graf @NonPlayableClown @verita84 Well, yeah, there's agreement but sometimes someone doesn't have anything interesting to say. Like, part of the reason I did that long-ass freedom of speech blog post was that I kept having to answer the same objections that were based on the lowest-common-Redditor version of what freedom of speech means, and I don't plan to try to defend a strawman against someone that is pushing their own lowest-common-Redditor version of "I hate freedom of speech!" at the internet. The conversation isn't worth having, because it's just a continuation/repeat of some pulled-out-of-the-ass Reddit conversation based on a shallow understanding of the topics. So, like, if I read someone that disagrees with me, I want to read someone that has something to say that makes me think, or at least someone that writes stuff that indicates that they're thinking.