@Suiseiseki @lxo @quasi @tennoseremel @LorenzoAncora > That should be native software like GNU Jami.
Yes.

> I am posting to the fediverse without JavaScript with BloatFE.
Emacs for me.

> Most of such sites are static sites, except instead of implementing them in FastCGI, they are implemented worse in JavaScript.
I miss when they weren't Javascript, they were legitimately superior and performed better.

> Static HTML pages with maybe some images and videos are best for learning, as that way there are no distractions.
There are actually some legitimate use-cases for interactive environments.

Consider Lisp CLIM, Smalltalk & their potential for various things. Computational notebooks are useful educational tools.

Active engagement's positive effects on memorization and learning are well researched by now.

They could also not pretend to be using HTML and could be fully Free/Libre Software (environments) distributed as such, rather than abusing HTML & web-based technology.

> None of them need JavaScript and should NOT have JavaScript.
Correct. They should be using Lisp.

But most of them also don't need a dynamic interactive code environment at all.

> Working without JavaScript is the minimum acceptable quality standards for any website.
Yes.