@boghan Yes I said there's no evidence. Perhaps everyone else things there is a chance of a non-zero amount of evidence. Ok. Perhaps a technicality but I am willing to update my stance on this: I'm not denying there's evidence. I'm saying there's not strong enough evidencs to be relevant in any legitimate discussion of the topic.
The evidence needs to be enough to be more evidence than alternative ideas. That's not unfair that's how reasoning works ("epistemiology" more or less)