Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://friedcheese.us/objects/16a3db32-9787-420c-aced-5257631885a0">feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Feb-2025 09:07:07 JST</a><a href="https://friedcheese.us/users/feld" title="feld@friedcheese.us"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/274913-48-20241012191855.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="feld" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">feld</a><div><a href="https://social.coop/@ambiguous_yelp/113947783052167467" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/309863" title="ambiguous_yelp@social.coop">🌱@ambiguous_yelp:ahimsa.chat</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/325872" title="gh0stz0x@poliverso.org">gh0stz0x</a></li></ul></div></section><article><a href="https://social.coop/@ambiguous_yelp">@ambiguous_yelp</a> <a href="https://poliverso.org/profile/gh0stz0x">@gh0stz0x</a> <a href="https://chaos.social/@delta">@delta</a> reminder that AES256 is considered "quantum resistant"*, but not "post-quantum".<br><br>Signal's cryptography is considered "post-quantum".<br><br>At this point PQC is more of a "nice to have" than a requirement for a secure private messenger. But we shouldn't sit on our laurels.<br><br><a href="https://www.fierceelectronics.com/electronics/aes-256-joins-quantum-resistance">https://www.fierceelectronics.com/electronics/aes-256-joins-quantum-resistance</a><br><br><br>* I'm not aware of this changing. If it has, send me a message and I'll bookmark the new info.</article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4509811#notice-8830252">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-02-05T09:07:07+09:00" title="Wednesday, 05-Feb-2025 09:07:07 JST">about 18 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://friedcheese.us/objects/16a3db32-9787-420c-aced-5257631885a0" rel="external" title="Sent from friedcheese.us via ActivityPub">friedcheese.us</a></span></span><a href="https://friedcheese.us/objects/16a3db32-9787-420c-aced-5257631885a0">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: qtxasset.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.fierceelectronics.com/electronics/aes-256-joins-quantum-resistance">AES-256 joins the quantum resistance</a></h5><div> from <span>Dan O'Shea</span></div></header><div>The cybersecurity and quantum technology sectors are still waiting for the National Institute of Standards and Technology to unveil its final list of post-quantum security algorithms, encryption sc | A Bluefin executive notes that the existing AES256 encryption standard is believed to be quantum-resistant and remains so for years to come.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
feld (feld@friedcheese.us)'s status on Wednesday, 05-Feb-2025 09:07:07 JSTfeld
in reply to
@ambiguous_yelp @gh0stz0x @delta reminder that AES256 is considered "quantum resistant"*, but not "post-quantum".

Signal's cryptography is considered "post-quantum".

At this point PQC is more of a "nice to have" than a requirement for a secure private messenger. But we shouldn't sit on our laurels.

https://www.fierceelectronics.com/electronics/aes-256-joins-quantum-resistance

* I'm not aware of this changing. If it has, send me a message and I'll bookmark the new info.
In conversationabout 18 days ago from friedcheese.uspermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: qtxasset.com
  AES-256 joins the quantum resistance
  from Dan O'Shea
  The cybersecurity and quantum technology sectors are still waiting for the National Institute of Standards and Technology to unveil its final list of post-quantum security algorithms, encryption sc | A Bluefin executive notes that the existing AES256 encryption standard is believed to be quantum-resistant and remains so for years to come.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice