@deutrino so my understanding is that the reason we have activitypub in its current form is that there was a time limit to submit a draft for w3c. it already had its deadline extended once and would have gotten dropped if it weren't submitted for approval or however it works. Even now, with years of backward perspective about what worked and what didn't etc, people are still arguing over how basic parts of it should work. I think this is a sign that the spec is too complicated for humans and a failure.