Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice@Witch_Hunter_Siegfired @MartianM00n @plotinus_enjoyer @Someguy @DarkGura @Escoffier >The issue with the Zoroastrian argument is that by all accounts the abrahamic dualistic thing came from it and not the inverse.
Hence my point about many peoples worshipping The Most High God.
Zoroaster is likely Daniel AKA Belteshazzar. Both were in Persia in the 6th century. Zoroastrianism has a history of oral tradition that predates Zoroaster and documentation of Zoroaster was written down centuries later. The wise men from the East who came to give offerings to Christ were likely Zoroastrian. OT religion and Zoroastrianism both share The God of creation establishing the universe from scratch rather than a god who shows up and battles other gods for right to rule— the active creation followed by ruling rather than clawing the world together from primordial essences or taming existing chaos is a different than most other religions of the age.