Embed Notice

@strypey @chrisjrn @mcc @jzb @fuzzychef And, in terms of an importance, regarding the even earlier GPLv3 Discussion Draft #2:

"We have also rejected suggestions, made by some discussion committee members, that the Affero clause requirement be removed, though we have revised it in response to certain comments. We are unwavering in our view that the Affero requirement is a legitimate one..."

Source: https://gplv3.fsf.org/additional-terms-dd2.pdf/