@Sui @JollyR @Red_Hat @BowsacNoodle @AnungIkwe @Kuenga

> If there were no grounds for a lawsuit they wouldn't need to worry.

This is incorrect. Vexatious litigants like RFKJ and Wakefield will continually plague them regardless of the frivolity of their claim

> The vaccines don't offer protection, they are ineffective and dangerous.

Wrong. They do offer protection, and have saved millions of lives and continue to do so.

> And yet they were marketed as such,

Ah yes "marketing". We were told, in canada, very explicitly what side effects to expect and what to do if it happened. Did that not happen in your country?

> and anybody stating that was instantly banned

Again with the censorship sob story I WAS BANNED FROM TWITTER TOO. LOTS of people were banned. This has been going on since I had a podcast, even, on BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

> . Covid's risks were exaggerated/downplayed

No. They were *systematically understated*.

> based on partisanism, you're on the far extreme of the exaggeration side.

No, I am not.

> We still don't know which was more risky,

Yes, we do. COVID.

> but governments weren't pushing mandatory covid infections were they?

YES THEY ARE
THEY STILL ARE

and at least my local government didn't push for mandatory vaccines, either. I was never even asked if I was vaccinated.

> Oh no the return swing's a bitch?

No, the return swing is what is going to happen to you covidiots when parents find out what you've done to their children.

> Boo fucking hoo. Those faggots begged for more moderation and cheered every single time anyone they disagreed with got yeeted.

Oh so now some random idiots on the other side of the rainbow curtain are somehow relevant?

> I see you ignored the important part of that sentence, shocker.

Meanwhile you are ignoring the tens of millions of people who have been safely vaccinated, and tracked in studies about vaccine safety.