Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/users/mjg59/statuses/113571197931258943">Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Sunday, 01-Dec-2024 04:36:41 JST</a><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/@mjg59" title="mjg59@nondeterministic.computer"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/24727-48-20221112153750.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Matthew Garrett" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Matthew Garrett</a></section><article><p>It's just… this is the level of discourse that's expected to be part of being part of the free software community? And it could just not be?</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4099242#notice-8009265">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-12-01T04:36:41+09:00" title="Sunday, 01-Dec-2024 04:36:41 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/@mjg59/113571197931258943" rel="external" title="Sent from nondeterministic.computer via ActivityPub">nondeterministic.computer</a></span></span><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/@mjg59/113571197931258943">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3601684">Screenshot of multiple posts. The first is by me and reads:"the reason this is interpreted as prejudice is the assertion that someone raised as a woman, who identifies as a woman, and who has always been treated as a woman is actually not a woman, but a "man with underdeveloped external genitalia". Accepting that argument means accepting that trans women aren't women, which is obviously transphobic. The nuance isn't complicated."The second is by @rcz@101010.pl and reads:"'You can't make this argument because it leads me to a conclusion I don't accept' is literally the definition of prejudice."I reply:"You can make this argument, it's just you can't simultaneously make this argument and believe that trans women are women. And if you don't believe the latter, you're transphobic." @rcz@101010.pl  replies:"You're certainly entitled to that prejudice."</a></label><br><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/system/media_attachments/files/113/571/188/394/640/036/original/49410f0f3902ef7f.png" rel="external">https://nondeterministic.computer/system/media_attachments/files/113/571/188/394/640/036/original/49410f0f3902ef7f.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Matthew Garrett (mjg59@nondeterministic.computer)'s status on Sunday, 01-Dec-2024 04:36:41 JST Matthew Garrett
It's just… this is the level of discourse that's expected to be part of being part of the free software community? And it could just not be?
In conversationabout 3 months ago from nondeterministic.computerpermalink
Attachments
1. Screenshot of multiple posts. The first is by me and reads: "the reason this is interpreted as prejudice is the assertion that someone raised as a woman, who identifies as a woman, and who has always been treated as a woman is actually not a woman, but a "man with underdeveloped external genitalia". Accepting that argument means accepting that trans women aren't women, which is obviously transphobic. The nuance isn't complicated." The second is by @rcz@101010.pl and reads: "'You can't make this argument because it leads me to a conclusion I don't accept' is literally the definition of prejudice." I reply: "You can make this argument, it's just you can't simultaneously make this argument and believe that trans women are women. And if you don't believe the latter, you're transphobic." @rcz@101010.pl replies: "You're certainly entitled to that prejudice."
  https://nondeterministic.computer/system/media_attachments/files/113/571/188/394/640/036/original/49410f0f3902ef7f.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice