• Public

  • Public
  • Network
  • Groups
  • Featured
  • Popular
  • People

Screenshot of multiple posts. The first is by me and reads: "the reason this is interpreted as prejudice is the assertion that someone raised as a woman, who identifies as a woman, and who has always been treated as a woman is actually not a woman, but a "man with underdeveloped external genitalia". Accepting that argument means accepting that trans women aren't women, which is obviously transphobic. The nuance isn't complicated." The second is by @rcz@101010.pl and reads: "'You can't make this argument because it leads me to a conclusion I don't accept' is literally the definition of prejudice." I reply: "You can make this argument, it's just you can't simultaneously make this argument and believe that trans women are women. And if you don't believe the latter, you're transphobic." @rcz@101010.pl replies: "You're certainly entitled to that prejudice."