@Zergling_man @817148c3690155401b494580871fb0564a5faafb9454813ef295f2706bc93359 @Flick @phnt

> Maybe not, and that's entirely on your side.

I do not think so. I don't think I'm going to convince you that someone else meant something else when they said something and I don't think it's useful.

> Look at that post, he says, in brief,

This is the issue. You can pick a piece out, but I talk to the guy every day. These aren't formal contracts, he's not signing a bill into law, it's a very informal conversation. So I see that and I read something that resembles all the other stuff he has said. We're looking at the same post, and if you are really interested in parsing the words that finely and treating it as a precise and isolated statement, sure, it's possible to take that meaning. Nobody wants to have a conversation that works that way, though.

I call people "bots" a lot and people that I talk to a lot know that I mean the person behaves closely enough that they may as well be a bot, and people that don't read it that way will say "You think he's a chatbot! I'm sitting right next to him, he's not a bot!" and they don't get what I mean and it's fine. Take it literally enough, treat it like an isolated statement, and calling someone a bot is factually incorrect, but I use it figuratively often enough that most people get my meaning.

So I saw the same post you did, but I read something different.

> And I am saying the last point is wrong.

I'm onboard with that, but Poast runs for people that use Poast; it has to work the way it works or the people on it are frustrated, and whatever you think of the people on it, graf committed to running a service, and he takes Poast pretty seriously as a commitment, and I think that's a good way to run a service.

> Do you think the post is not saying that? Do you think the last point is right?

I don't like catering to normies but if I had started Poast, I'd try to make sure I kept up the commitment to operate Poast as Poast. I don't want to host loli but because I have agreed to import bae.st into Revolver, I'll be hosting a lot of loli; luckily for me, I'm not "hosting" it in the traditional sense, but I agreed to what I agreed to and I'm going to stick to it.

> it is frustrating to see you stubbornly not understanding me.

I don't think I've misunderstood you, just I don't think you and graf are communicating effectively.