Good morning or evening @Gargron
In response to @nelsonakis you express that “ We may however moderate accounts that share misinformation or use antisemitic tropes such as Holocaust inversion.”
By not providing proof of such “misinformation” or “tropes such as Holocaust inversion”, you cast more shadows than light on the matter in question and the feeling remains that moderation is done from a biased perspective and contrary to the freedom of speech that is so much defended in this type of platforms.
Moreover, if in this type of digital spaces it is not possible to expicite the atrocities that the Israeli government headed by Netanyahu commits daily against the Palestinian people, in that case, the contradiction between discourse and practice becomes more than pathetic.
Can you provide reliable proof that the silenced or hidden account of the public line incurred in what you express in your answer?
I support the above question in two aspects: a) in the reasoning of @nelsonakis “the reasoning behind such a decision, maybe even with the user's post(s) that triggered it.” and the principle of Onus probandi.