@6gorillanbarsofjewsoap @placebo @poastoak @gentoobro >The nature of it is highly relevant if its a litmus to character of course.
Absolutely. Taking on a mortgage or a normal and realistic car payment ≠ "she has debt" IMO. I'm talking about habitually spending beyond means and carrying a ton of credit and debt for random BS— general financial mismanagement and consumerism.

>The instruction to not imprint images on the skin is a direct and unambiguous direction from the Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ and an affront to God himself.
Perhaps the latter point, but it's sort of like animal strangulation or consuming blood— the purpose isn't to say not to do it for the sake of The Law, but because of what those things meant to the people of that day. Tattoos were likely associated with some pagan/demonic worship rituals.

>Tattoos are a disdainful display of vanity, pride and self absorption
I have mixed thoughts on this. I've seen people who certainly fit this, but others who don't. The small hidden tattoo is different from the neck or full sleeve too. I prefer zero, but if I had to find a new wahmyn, I'd probably put bad money management as worse than small tattoos.