Embed Notice

@Suiseiseki >Wrong fuel grade...You need to enrich uranium to a much higher level to make a bomb than what is used in power reactors.

Below is response to someone else:

>its not just about "nuclear bombs", but yes it does create a demand for the mining of things that should not be mined.
>spent radioactive fuels have been used for sickening (literally and figuratively) war crimes on peoples this century ie. since 2000....that's all i'll say.

i'll just add i dont care about the "amount of enrichment" the stuff should barely be removed from the ground at all. Uses beyond medical be damned. Its false to claim spent fuel is not used in weapons and u seem like u'd know better so i have to wonder whether u are trying to mislead.

spent fuel bombs have also been used (or threathened to be used) in a current racist war the usa state dept is conducting via proxies they groomed over fecebook. so not just something that has been used against middle east this century, but also against eastern europe (and some might argue, europe itself).

as an aside i find it interesting that also trump tore up the treaty that was about reducing the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

regardless, if we think big tech a too powerful now wait till they have control of nuclear energy too. Oh wait, look, fake puppet president (biden) seemingly allowed #amazon to purchase a nuclear power station in march. #monopoly #plutocracy #robberbarons

>A controlled amount of radiation above the baseline like what nuclear employees get appears to reduce cancer occurrence.

no. there's no save amount of "background" exposure, including of the waste produced. sounds like a nuke lobby lie. what kind of studies are u looking at? not the fami'liar' #biostitute ones, i hope?

>small modular reactors...."walk away and ignore" safety

a macabre joke not worth answering