@garfieldairlines @SuperDicq

It should be noted that, while rms just wrote some spicy opinions on a blog or mailing list that nobody reads, Drew actually helped categorize a popular public repository of drawings that sexualize children (he tagged erotic lolicon material on danbooru for YEARS, in one instance a hardcore image), and had an image search tool running on another such popular public repository (r/pomf) that seems to have contained a ton of arguably realistic drawings of child rape. (I've only taken a glance at the archive of r/pomf and had to close it again so as not to vomit.)

So what I'm saying is: No, he shouldn't get the same treatment as rms. He should be criticized a hundred times harder.

It's not inconceivable that Drew might have even possessed images over the years whose legality is unclear (or ones that are outright illegal) in many modern jurisdictions because there exist laws against "fictional child pornography." He seems safe in NL though.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors