Conversation

Notices

1. Embed this notice
   SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 19:30:57 JST SuperDicq

   Here, have a list of instances that think arguing against Drew's hate campaign think is worth reporting for.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 19:43:10 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • garfieldairlines.net

     @garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net "Supporting pedophilia" ok fairNo, it's not fair. Discussions about finding the right balance between autonomy, infantilization and safety should not be taboo.
     
     If you are even suggesting something of the normie accepted social norms when it comes to these topics you are immediately painted as a disgusting freak by some of these people, no matter in which context. It's actually insane.

   • Embed this notice
     garfieldairlines.net (garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 19:43:11 JST garfieldairlines.net

     in reply to

     @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo "Supporting pedophilia" ok fair, but I hope Drew gets the same treatment as well then, right ?

   • Embed this notice
     Sick Sun (sun@shitposter.world)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 19:44:26 JST Sick Sun

     in reply to
     @SuperDicq the person claiming you're "defending pedophilia" should be beaten.
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 19:48:00 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • garfieldairlines.net

     @garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net Basically what I'm trying to say is that "youth liberation" is a valid and real political standpoint.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 21:32:28 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Taylan
     • garfieldairlines.net

     @taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org @garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net I don't think it should be controversial to look at lolicon at all actually, it's just fiction. I don't want people to think Drew is a disgusting freak that should be locked up either.
     
     My stance on this is just that it is very hypocritical for Drew to launch a smear campaign against Stallman in the way that he did, and that he shouldn't be surprised it backfired and people are doing the same to him now. That's all I care about.

   • Embed this notice
     Taylan (taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 21:32:29 JST Taylan

     in reply to

     • garfieldairlines.net
     @garfieldairlines @SuperDicq
     
     It should be noted that, while rms just wrote some spicy opinions on a blog or mailing list that nobody reads, Drew actually helped categorize a popular public repository of drawings that sexualize children (he tagged erotic lolicon material on danbooru for YEARS, in one instance a hardcore image), and had an image search tool running on another such popular public repository (r/pomf) that seems to have contained a ton of arguably realistic drawings of child rape. (I've only taken a glance at the archive of r/pomf and had to close it again so as not to vomit.)
     
     So what I'm saying is: No, he shouldn't get the same treatment as rms. He should be criticized a hundred times harder.
     
     It's not inconceivable that Drew might have even possessed images over the years whose legality is unclear (or ones that are outright illegal) in many modern jurisdictions because there exist laws against "fictional child pornography." He seems safe in NL though.
     
     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_pornography_depicting_minors
   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 21:36:23 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Taylan
     • garfieldairlines.net

     @garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net @taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org Oh yeah, that one is definitely worse than any of the radical opinions on posted Stallman's blog.

   • Embed this notice
     garfieldairlines.net (garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 21:36:24 JST garfieldairlines.net

     in reply to

     • Taylan

     @SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo @taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org I don't care that much about lolicon as long as it's 100% worf of fiction, but "Put IUDs without consent into 14 year old girls" is quite the hardcore take.

   • Embed this notice
     SuperDicq (superdicq@minidisc.tokyo)'s status on Monday, 28-Oct-2024 21:40:20 JST SuperDicq

     in reply to

     • Taylan
     • garfieldairlines.net

     @garfieldairlines@fedi.garfieldairlines.net @taylan@fedi.feministwiki.org And these takes like "no woman is able to support a child until 24" is actually quite the opposite of Stallman's takes on similar that come from a genuine Youth Liberation movement point of view.