Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://shpposter.club/objects/e1592fc5-8941-4514-9fa8-29e3dc8ee802">Birdulon (birdulon@shpposter.club)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 00:07:35 JST</a><a href="https://shpposter.club/users/birdulon" title="birdulon@shpposter.club"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/4715-48-20240517133041.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Birdulon" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Birdulon</a><div><a href="https://shpposter.club/objects/2d73bc2b-45d8-4175-a401-08b595ee4295" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/252828" title="sun@shitposter.world">Sick Sun</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/288040" title="elizlaraki@bird.makeup">Elizabeth Laraki</a></li></ul></div></section><article><a href="https://shitposter.world/users/sun">@sun</a> <a href="https://bird.makeup/users/elizlaraki">@elizlaraki</a> <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440</a></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3850240#notice-7529097">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-10-20T00:07:35+09:00" title="Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 00:07:35 JST">about a month ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/7529097" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/7529097">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au</div><h5><a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440">Is Nine's Photoshop explanation for an MP's altered image plausible? Here's what we found</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.abc.net.au/news/mikaela-ortolan/11511666</span></div></header><div>A graphics expert says Nine News's explanation for how a digitally altered photo of Victorian Animal Rights Party MP Georgie Purcell was put to air is plausible — and raises important questions over the way the technology is used across society.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Birdulon (birdulon@shpposter.club)'s status on Sunday, 20-Oct-2024 00:07:35 JSTBirdulon
in reply to
@sun @elizlaraki https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-01/georgie-purcell-ai-image-nine-news-apology-digital-ethics/103408440
In conversationabout a month ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: live-production.wcms.abc-cdn.net.au
  Is Nine's Photoshop explanation for an MP's altered image plausible? Here's what we found
  from https://www.abc.net.au/news/mikaela-ortolan/11511666
  A graphics expert says Nine News's explanation for how a digitally altered photo of Victorian Animal Rights Party MP Georgie Purcell was put to air is plausible — and raises important questions over the way the technology is used across society.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice