@p @NEETzsche @mint I feel like this would create quite a lot of pain, even though I think if you distribute binaries you ought to at least distribute source code at the exact same place.

And I think I'd rather have a license which requires to distribute a Source Code-only tarball, nothing pre-compiled/assembled/… in there.
It's kind of bonkers that we don't have this but makes sense when you know that GNU tends to ship binaries in their tarballs (one example being gettext which has .class files and a .exe) and is stuck into intermediate code due to autotools.