Embed Notice

@drewdevault Someone's inspiration stemming from their gender experience, is different than gender politics themselves.
I'm fine with people saying "hey, this was a problem I struggled with and it led me to make this awesome thing" but that's different from saying "you must do this and that!".
I would definitely be interested in a slight background on what got someone to create something (as that can provide context on the decisions made while the awesome thing was made).
However, the main focus should (in my opinion) still be the thing that was made, not the fact someone has a certain gender.

Also, you seem to try to silence my opinions by saying "you wouldn't have to participate, so why object?" and "your sentiment comes from a place of privilege" (you don't know what I had to suffer through to get where I am now - and no, that's not trying to say that I've had it better or worse than someone else).
Am I not allowed to say that *I* would rather not have those things?
You asked whether there should be a "Society and Politics devroom", I just say that I see a high chance certain things happening that *I* would not want.
I'm not forbidding FOSDEM from having it, I'm not saying people absolutely cannot talk about it it; I'm just giving *my* input saying that *I* wouldn't want those things and what *my* expectations of an event like FOSDEM are.

Either way, I have given my input so there's that.
Use it or ignore it, that's up to you.
Enjoy!

@SuperDicq