The problem of "today's" AI is not a level or implementation problem. It is that what they are producing is not intelligence. AI has nothing to do with intelligence. What they have produced is a very expensive engine that can generate pertinent answers in grammatically correct, though often simple, English. This is not a small achievement, but it is not intelligence.
You claim "There is not reason we will not create intelligence someday."
This is a very bold assertion, one with no evidence or thought behind it at all. Can you even define what intelligence is? The AI industry gave that pursuit up in the 1980s.
I would assert, quite baldly, that computers, being what they are, and given how they work, will never ever ever, on a fundamental level, be capable of intelligence, no matter how much programming you put into the effort.
BTW the Turing Test is ontological nonsense.