@edshot99 @udon
> I think paying attention to which server or servers blocked you is a waste of time since people are always going to do this regardless.

On the flipside, it doubles as advertisement.
Where the one side wants you silenced to death, the other side will take it as a confirmation that you're a decent instance.

> Why? It is not like people will succeed with this.

I already explained why in the same status, so I don't think I need to explain it a 2nd time.

> The only time where I have seen a website get "cancelled" is websites like Kick Ass Torrents or Library Genesis. Even in those situations it isn't ICANN or the domain name company who cuts them off, but the company where they get their domain name from who cooperates with the government.

Obviously, I mean "me" as in "me", not "me" as in "the entire website".

> People can still run shitty javascript websites on "darknets" and transfer all the garbage from clearnet and run it on these "darknets".

I haven't encountered much of these.
Most are actually just HTML + CSS + images.
Probably the one that actually relies on JS is some anon webchat service, but then again it's understandable why you'd use JS for that.
Websoytes that rely on JS while they would have been built without it perfectly fine is what I usually have a problem with.
Why the fuck do I even need to get myself a 32 Tebibyte RAM Core i21 with 100 million trillion cores just to read somebody else's travel blog and still experience lag for example!?