I see you may have a point, but my rigidity won't allow me to go along with it: to me, that 'free of charge' became shortened into a twisted version of 'free' is not a reason to give up the term, but to fight for its most relevant meaning. and there's another counterpoint: software *is* speech (that's why it's copyrightable), and there's value in opposing productization and establishing it as expressive and cultural media, where freedom should prevail over market forces