Strypey(1/?)
@Wuzzy
> The term "open source" is broken anyway
It's a generic term, so there's only so much gatekeeping anyone can do. But the OSI continue to endorse only licenses that also meet the Free Software Definition. Eg they rejected the recent crop of Source Available licenses, for failing to respect the same OSD criteria the Llama license violates, as you point out.
All GNU social JP content and data are available under the