Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://libranet.de/objects/0b6b25a8-1266-9a0b-9e49-6af008740991">clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 18:23:12 JST</a><a href="https://libranet.de/profile/clacke" title="clacke@libranet.de"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="clacke" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">clacke</a><div><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@RL_Dane/112810887305547955" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/4396" title="zens@merveilles.town">Luci for Chai Tea</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/RL_Dane">@RL_Dane</a> <a href="https://merveilles.town/users/zens">@zens</a> Some people have been designing fantasy CPUs like that, yeah.</p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-instruction_set_computer" rel="noreferrer">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-inst…</a></p><p>But in the real world: "recent Intel x86 MMUs are actually Turing-complete OISCs"</p><p>And TrapCC compiles this weird subset-of-x86 architecture.</p><p>I seem to remember there's also some normal x86 instruction that is flexible enough that it can be used as an instruction set of its own.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3396394#notice-6682976">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-07-19T18:23:12+09:00" title="Friday, 19-Jul-2024 18:23:12 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/6682976" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/6682976">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2927218">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
clacke (clacke@libranet.de)'s status on Friday, 19-Jul-2024 18:23:12 JSTclacke
in reply to
- R. L. Dane :debian: :openbsd:
- Luci for Chai Tea
@RL_Dane @zens Some people have been designing fantasy CPUs like that, yeah.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-inst…
But in the real world: "recent Intel x86 MMUs are actually Turing-complete OISCs"
And TrapCC compiles this weird subset-of-x86 architecture.
I seem to remember there's also some normal x86 instruction that is flexible enough that it can be used as an instruction set of its own.
In conversationabout 4 months ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice