@raccoon >that just because something is free software it performs better
Developed free software almost always perform better.

I can easily bring my GNUbooted thinkpad everywhere I go if I wish.

>Go tell a professional photographer to replace Photoshop with gimp and see how well it will go.
Depending on what kind of post-processing the photographer wants to do, GIMP may contain all of the required image manipulation functionality.

It can crop, convert, scale, adjust colour values etc just fine, as well as all standard post-processing tasks.

Sure it won't let your conveniently do bizarre things that nobody asked for like automatically remove birthmarks from photos - you'd need to manually use the smudge tool for that, but why would you want to do that?

Too bad many photographers are unwilling to learn anything difficult once they've shackled themselves to a master.

>What are you even trying to show here?
The video demonstrates how "good of a product" ipads are when a native note tool is pitted against a CPU from 1999 running slow-ass non-native JavaScript when in comes to ability to type things.