Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://sfba.social/users/goodreedAJ/statuses/112740661655896495">Ande Jacobson (goodreedaj@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jul-2024 02:32:18 JST</a><a href="https://sfba.social/@goodreedAJ" title="goodreedaj@sfba.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75040-48-20230514024759.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Ande Jacobson" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Ande Jacobson</a><div><a href="https://social.coop/@randy/112740630365537680" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/44595" title="histopol@mastodon.social">HistoPol (#HP) 🏴 🇺🇸  🏴</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/159157" title="randy@social.coop">Randy Hall</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://social.coop/@randy">@randy</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol">@HistoPol</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@GottaLaff">@GottaLaff</a></p><p>Exactly! Sounds like people really need to watch Heather Cox Richardson's recent CNN interview. She talks about this in some detail, and historically, a late replacement after the electorate has chosen its candidate will lose. It's a sure-fire way to hand the election to the other side. </p><p>Just look at the 1968 election - Johnson declined the nomination after being selected through the primaries, and switching to Hubert Humphrey gave Nixon the presidency. We all know what happened after that.  </p><p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/03/tv/video/amanpour-heather-cox-richardson" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/03/tv/video/amanpour-heather-cox-richardson</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3338862#notice-6575445">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-07-07T02:32:18+09:00" title="Sunday, 07-Jul-2024 02:32:18 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://sfba.social/@goodreedAJ/112740661655896495" rel="external" title="Sent from sfba.social via ActivityPub">sfba.social</a></span></span><a href="https://sfba.social/@goodreedAJ/112740661655896495">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.cnn.com</div><h5><a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/03/tv/video/amanpour-heather-cox-richardson">‘We have never been here as a country’: Historian Heather Cox Richardson puts Trump immunity ruling into perspective | CNN</a></h5><div> from <span>Alex Hardie</span></div></header><div>Christiane Amanpour speaks to author and historian Heather Cox Richardson about the challenges facing American democracy in this election year.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Ande Jacobson (goodreedaj@sfba.social)'s status on Sunday, 07-Jul-2024 02:32:18 JSTAnde Jacobson
in reply to
@randy @HistoPol @GottaLaff
Exactly! Sounds like people really need to watch Heather Cox Richardson's recent CNN interview. She talks about this in some detail, and historically, a late replacement after the electorate has chosen its candidate will lose. It's a sure-fire way to hand the election to the other side.
Just look at the 1968 election - Johnson declined the nomination after being selected through the primaries, and switching to Hubert Humphrey gave Nixon the presidency. We all know what happened after that.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/03/tv/video/amanpour-heather-cox-richardson
In conversationabout a year ago from sfba.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: media.cnn.com
  ‘We have never been here as a country’: Historian Heather Cox Richardson puts Trump immunity ruling into perspective | CNN
  from Alex Hardie
  Christiane Amanpour speaks to author and historian Heather Cox Richardson about the challenges facing American democracy in this election year.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice