GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE

  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice

  1. Embed this notice
    billiam :4chan: (billiam@shitposter.world)'s status on Sunday, 26-May-2024 00:08:08 JSTbilliam :4chan:billiam :4chan:
    in reply to
    • on-lain ✔ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ
    • :gnu:+bonifartius 𒂼𒄄
    @lain @bonifartius alt hype also has some videos:
    >The Expertise of Experts
    https://altcensored.com/watch?v=J8nk7GrB-zs

    >The Authoritarian View of Knowledge: Peer Review
    https://altcensored.com/watch?v=zR38CtjD__o
    In conversationabout 6 months ago from shitposter.worldpermalink

    Attachments

    1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: ia801002.us.archive.org
      The Expertise of Experts
      The Authoritarian View of Knowledge II: The Expertise of Experts --- Links --- Bit Chute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/thealthype/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TheAltHypothesis/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/Freesoilyeah SubscribeStar: https://www.subscribestar.com/ryan-faulk Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/CoolTapes Website: https://thealternativehypothesis.org/ --- Sources ---- Study on Health Science Knowledge Retention: http://www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/How%20Much%20Do%20Students%20Remember%20Over%20Time.pdf Study on Consumer Behavior Class Knowledge Retention: http://www.uky.edu/~kdbrad2/EPE773R/StudentPapers/ConsumerBehavior.pdf Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College Knowledge Retention Study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1924649/ Knowledge Loss of First Year Science Students in Saskatchewan: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1397826/ Knowledge Decay in Economics Students: http://sci-hub.tw/10.2307/1182376 Cognitive Ability by Credential Level: https://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/12/04/blacks-and-whites-with-equal-educational-attainment-differ-in-cognitive-ability/ Meta-Analysis of Old Studies on Retention of Basic Scientific Knowledge: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/s10459-008-9101-y University of Colorado Retention Study: https://www.cs.colorado.edu/~mozer/Research/Selected%20Publications/reprints/LindseyShroyerPashlerMozer2014.pdf Average Age of Doctorates: https://wayback.archive-it.org/5902/20160210153659/http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf06312/ Meta-Analysis on Statistical Prediction Rules: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 IQ Decline in the US: https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.035 Papers on Academic Mobbing: http://sci-hub.tw/10.2753/ATP1084-1806320103 http://sci-hub.se/10.1080/13594320801969707 http://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s10672-012-9193-7 Hoel and Cooper 2000: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8321/ffcc35416b266ccd84e0da63fb3348bfb5ac.pdf (Published on Aug 22, 2019)
    2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: ia803003.us.archive.org
      The Authoritarian View of Knowledge: Peer Review
      Donate: https://www.subscribestar.com/ryan-faulk https://www.patreon.com/CoolTapes Social Media: https://twitter.com/Freesoilyeah https://www.facebook.com/TheAltHypothesis/ === Time Stamps: 5:55 - Big vs. Small Journals 11:51 - Judging Methodology Based on Conclusions 15:59 - BMJ Study on Error Identification Rate 17:37 - Prestige and Paper Acceptance 22:59 - Inter-Rate Reliability 24:17 - Does "Peer Review" CAUSE Studies to be Better Done? 26:58 - A HOT TAKE on "Peer Review" Sources: 1. Reviewer Bias, Annals of Internal Medicine: http://sci-hub.tw/10.7326/0003-4819-116-11-958_2 2. Peer Review and Editorial Decision Making: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1192/bjp.173.2.110 3. Effect of Institutional Prestige on Reviewer's Recommendations and Editorial Decisions: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1001/jama.1994.03520020063017 4. Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/202669 5. Double-Blind Peer Review Failure Rate: https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/rccm.201711-2257LE https://blogs.plos.org/absolutely-maybe/2017/10/31/the-fractured-logic-of-blinded-peer-review-in-journals/ 6. Are Road Safety Evaluation Studies Published in Peer Reviewed Journals More Valid than Similar Studies not Published in Peer Reviewd Journals: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00068-7 7. A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multileval Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0014331 8. Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037/full 9. Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1177/016224399001500102 10. Testing for the Presence of Positive-Outcome Bias in Peer Review: http://sci-hub.tw/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.406 11. What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2586872/ 12. Retracted Science and the Retraction Index https://iai.asm.org/content/79/10/3855.full 13. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review https://www.pnas.org/content/114/48/12708 (Published on Jul 23, 2019)
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.