Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mstdn.social/users/GreenFire/statuses/112389127552444383">Kevin Leecaster (greenfire@mstdn.social)'s status on Monday, 13-May-2024 07:50:20 JST</a><a href="https://mstdn.social/@GreenFire" title="greenfire@mstdn.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/106597-48-20250411215756.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Kevin Leecaster" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Kevin Leecaster</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@InkySchwartz/112389110669965187" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/158695" title="bangclankboom@mastodon.social">Missed It Again!❤️🖤</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@InkySchwartz">@InkySchwartz</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@BangClankBoom">@BangClankBoom</a> <br>I disagree. All the analyses I've seen suggest that Ralph Nader caused tons of global warming.</p><p>This paper estimates the impact of Ralph Nader’s candidacy in the 2000 United States presidential election...</p><p>Mathematically, based the information laid out below, it seems that Florida was the only state in which Nader probably impacted the results by taking enough votes from Gore to allow Bush to win the state (and therefore the presidency).<br><a href="https://amarkfoundation.org/reports/nader-florida-and-the-2000-election/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://amarkfoundation.org/reports/nader-florida-and-the-2000-election/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3081388#notice-6106984">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-05-13T07:50:20+09:00" title="Monday, 13-May-2024 07:50:20 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@GreenFire/112389127552444383" rel="external" title="Sent from mstdn.social via ActivityPub">mstdn.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mstdn.social/@GreenFire/112389127552444383">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: amarkfoundation.org</div><h5><a href="https://amarkfoundation.org/reports/nader-florida-and-the-2000-election/">Did Ralph Nader or Florida's Butterfly Ballot Cost Al Gore the 2000 Election?</a></h5><div></div></header><div>This report based primarily on math investigates whether third party candidate Ralph Nader or a confusing ballot design in Florida led to George W. Bush winning the 2000 presidential election.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Kevin Leecaster (greenfire@mstdn.social)'s status on Monday, 13-May-2024 07:50:20 JSTKevin Leecaster
in reply to
- Inky says "What the hell?!"
- Missed It Again!❤️🖤
@InkySchwartz @BangClankBoom
I disagree. All the analyses I've seen suggest that Ralph Nader caused tons of global warming.
This paper estimates the impact of Ralph Nader’s candidacy in the 2000 United States presidential election...
Mathematically, based the information laid out below, it seems that Florida was the only state in which Nader probably impacted the results by taking enough votes from Gore to allow Bush to win the state (and therefore the presidency).
https://amarkfoundation.org/reports/nader-florida-and-the-2000-election/
In conversationabout a year ago from mstdn.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: amarkfoundation.org
  Did Ralph Nader or Florida's Butterfly Ballot Cost Al Gore the 2000 Election?
  This report based primarily on math investigates whether third party candidate Ralph Nader or a confusing ballot design in Florida led to George W. Bush winning the 2000 presidential election.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice