Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://one.darnell.one/users/darnell/statuses/112349195749282068">Darnell Clayton :verified: (darnell@one.darnell.one)'s status on Sunday, 28-Apr-2024 22:58:17 JST</a><a href="https://one.darnell.one/@darnell" title="darnell@one.darnell.one"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/903-48-20220924005929.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Darnell Clayton :verified:" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Darnell Clayton :verified:</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@J_aa_p/112349159426423447" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/257658" title="j_aa_p@mastodon.social">Jaap</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@J_aa_p">@J_aa_p</a> <a href="https://social.tchncs.de/@schnedan">@schnedan</a> I know the info is probably classified, but I assumed NATO boasted powerful nukes that would rival most nuclear weapons in Russia’s 🇷🇺 arsenal. </p><p>We have plenty of “convential” weapons that can stop tanks—like spent Uranium munitions which may have used by the United States 🇺🇸 against tanks in Iraq 🇮🇶. <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/19/us-depleted-uranium-weapons-civilian-areas-iraq" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/19/us-depleted-uranium-weapons-civilian-areas-iraq</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3007147#notice-5971962">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-04-28T22:58:17+09:00" title="Sunday, 28-Apr-2024 22:58:17 JST">about 7 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://one.darnell.one/@darnell/112349195749282068" rel="external" title="Sent from one.darnell.one via ActivityPub">one.darnell.one</a></span></span><a href="https://one.darnell.one/@darnell/112349195749282068">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk</div><h5><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/19/us-depleted-uranium-weapons-civilian-areas-iraq">US fired depleted uranium at civilian areas in 2003 Iraq war, report finds</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/rob-edwards</span></div></header><div>Dutch peace group Pax says findings show US was in breach of official advice meant to prevent suffering in conflicts</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Darnell Clayton :verified: (darnell@one.darnell.one)'s status on Sunday, 28-Apr-2024 22:58:17 JSTDarnell Clayton :verified:
in reply to
- schnedan
- Jaap
@J_aa_p @schnedan I know the info is probably classified, but I assumed NATO boasted powerful nukes that would rival most nuclear weapons in Russia’s 🇷🇺 arsenal.
We have plenty of “convential” weapons that can stop tanks—like spent Uranium munitions which may have used by the United States 🇺🇸 against tanks in Iraq 🇮🇶. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/19/us-depleted-uranium-weapons-civilian-areas-iraq
In conversationabout 7 months ago from one.darnell.onepermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk
  US fired depleted uranium at civilian areas in 2003 Iraq war, report finds
  from https://www.theguardian.com/profile/rob-edwards
  Dutch peace group Pax says findings show US was in breach of official advice meant to prevent suffering in conflicts

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice