>yes but 1800 years in human history is just a blip
No, not really. I can't think of a single other thing in recorded history that required the better part of 2 millenia of buildup in order to see even the slightest payoff.
>kikes have multigenerational plans
Sure, and there's usually some kind of firsthand corroboration and not question-begging just so stories. If you've got some kind of proof of a strictly oral tradition entirely hidden from outsiders surviving for more than a few generations, you need to get a hold of some anthropologists because that would be an absolutely revolutionary breakthrough in the field.
>no, my original point was Christian’s shouldn’t be attacking White people for having interest in, studying, or discussing pre-Christian European mythology.
Due to the nature of how annoying it is to navigate back through multi-quote-post hellthreads, I'm going to be nice and probably give you far more credit than I would get from you and give you the benefit of the doubt here. I'm sure earlier on in the thread, that probably was your angle. However, for the previously stated reason (and the additional reason that after seeing so many religious hellthreads, I cannot possibly imagine this one to finally have new things I truly have never encountered before), I have not gone back through and pored over every post. I just see the one bowsac quoted, which contains the text in picrel. Now, I'm sure earlier in the thread it was just "I don't think there's anything wrong if some White guy wants to learn about Thor/Zeus/etc." But here, it's "christianity is responsible for White genocide" (ironically, something that prima facie is demonstrably false- the White birthrate in North America is nearly singlehandedly being carried by White Evangelical Conservatives, but I digress) which, to me at least, seems like quite a far cry from the original idea; a complete non-sequiter, even.