First of all, Cain cannot be Bigfoot because I have been to his house and he lets me eat his chicken. [pic (PROOF) related]

>I think being personally called out and expelled by God trumps the need for serpent Sneed

Part 4 (the final effortpost part, I expect) will I think at least be insightful to why I would think otherwise and what I have found convincing.

Here's a teaser of things needing explanation:

Sodom recieves death for its sin once its transgression is "full." At what point is it full? Which sin? Why didn't Cain recieve death for his sin?
And why was Cain (if the eldest son), not accepted with his offering? Why was Abel?
And shouldn't this be about one's fruit, as Christ says? (It should be, and it is.)
What commandment did Cain break? What law? (He didn't. But Sodom did.)

A lot will rest/kick off with this from Romans 5:
>Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

Just hoping to show that this is an argument I'll actually build. (And you can observe for yourself and push it with what weight you can. Either it falls and I learn more or it stands and I learned how to convey what I'm seeing well along the way.)

It may have to be a two-parter. I think 1 is enough (succinct and weight bearing) and 2 would be going through the "and even here, this part agrees because."

I'll try to get Part 4 out tomorrow. We'll see! Thank you for discussing with me along the way.

(And did you see Part 2? Listing in the order of Melchizedek who was the first, second, third, fourth, etc.)

Thanks again

🥂