@wjmaggos Every time I catch myself wondering if I was too harsh with you last time we spoke, you say something like this. Here's some of that famous empathy your vapid kind is always insisting that $outgroup lacks, I suppose.

You have the luxury of being a white liberal in a city where your beliefs, indistinguishable from any other Karen on the street, align with the orthodoxy, the orthodoxy that paints itself as an underdog while being favored by every bank, newspaper, and public institution in your town, beliefs that are present in every corporation's mandatory sensitivity training: you allegedly hate Nazis, but you would have been one. Or do you really think that you would have told Hitler that "trans rights are human rights" (good luck without freedom of speech) and it's just a coincidence that you staunchly support $current_thing? If you were alive when socialist darling Eugene Debs was being sent to prison for exercising his freedom of speech and the "fire in a crowded theater" justification was concocted for locking him up, would you have said "Well, cunts need to be moderated"? You are from the town where LBJ commissioned the beatdown of the protestors at the 1968 DNC. Did the hippies at Kent State need "moderation"? When they hounded Frank Zappa and later Jello Biafra, were they justified because obscenity and think of the children and nobody needs to use language like that etc.? Now in anno domini $current_year, the $current_thing dictates that freedom of speech is right-wing, so now you hate it. Don't address me about my principles: you have none.

Now you are kicking a dead dog in order to make some sort of point. You're addressing me because it was my dog and you want to make a point about politics and you're petty enough that it seemed like a good idea to you. (I have been inundated with "mean words on the internet" on a daily basis for years: you will have to try harder if you want to evoke anything besides contempt.) The point is so poorly made that I'm not sure what your point is. ("If your dead dog had been one of the people celebrated by glorious party orthodoxy, different people would have shat on you!" I can guarantee that exactly the same people would have shat on me that have been shitting on me since the beginning.) Effort trying to decipher your point is wasted: I do not expect you're worth listening to. You do not know what the policy is here and have never asked and have never listened and have never answered a question I asked and you, while shitting the place up, assume that I get shat on less than whoever. (If you are looking for the anti-trans brigade, they are over at gleasonator.com and spinster.xyz..) The one thing that did come through is the hostility. Since you don't listen to anything I say, and you're this much of an asshole, why should I bother to listen to anything you say? I'll tell you the same thing I tell the other Nazis: next time you show up to give orders to someone you can't bother to converse with, give me a reason to care. Common courtesy was extended and not returned, common courtesy stretched and finally snapped off last time, and now you've come to shit on it, like you are a long-running false flag operation paid to make your "side" look bad. Absent common courtesy, there's no reason to care what you have to say. If I had a dramatic change of worldview and no longer cared about freedom of speech, you'd be in the same bucket as those "cunts" you insist need to be "moderated".
s.gif