@Amalek_Respector @SuperLutheran @Crux_Invictus The first retort is theological. Just as many is in a fallen state, so too is nature.

Second, "homosexual acts" in animals is so broadly defined as to be completely useless. For instance, researchers have defined males in packs looking after offspring that aren't their own as "homosexual behavior." Most of what could possibly constitute actually "homosexual behavior" is actually just mounting behavior. Using dogs as an example, they'll hump literally everything if they're in the mood.

Third, these behaviors are so rare as to be non-existent in the wild. Homosexual behavior in captivity is very likely just an outworking of the disorder caused by a behavioral sink.

Fourth, fags will crow about how "so many species show homosexual behavior," while ignoring that precisely NONE have ever shown homosexual *preference* when nearby females are in heat.