> I'm talking about historical context of late second temple Judaism

Literally couldn't matter less to bloodlines, which is all this about. You're seemingly just tangenting around. This is literally all just "HE'S A JOO!" as a OHKO, and then so fucking much mental gymnastics to be like "But jesus was one of the good ones!". If there are no good ones, then there are no good ones. It's gotta be consistent or at least stop pretending it's a principle. If you love jews you love jews 🤷♂️

>fundamentally a younger religion than Christianity.
.... Lol ok sure, you're like a young earther or some shit I guess? I've tried talking sense to that shit but it's all just denial and faith, I'll skip.

You're confusing ethnicity and ideology. We're not talking about ideology here, we're talking about the ethnicity side. It's what you're born as and nobody is born religious (which is why it requires indoctrination). Jesus was both ethnically jewish and religiously, so it's still a OHKO to him but it'll just get confusing if you keep jumping around pretending it's the same thing.

> Much like the people who call themselves "Jews" today

Most people who call themselves "christian" today haven't even read the bible. People lie a lot.

> They are not irredeemable by blood

I think one of the recent popes said something similar about jews and heaven. But this entire topic started because (to them) everything with jew blood IS irredeemable. And then they just start REEing and sperging out when you mention the kike on a stick that they pretend to love and follow. He was a fucking hippy ffs, pretty much nobody here is following that crap. It's way more common to misquote the OT and pretend that it wasn't written by jews for jews.

Anyway I guess the thread's done, as we don't actually disagree on the one thing this was meant to be about lol? You're less hypocritical than a lot of your peers 🍻