@SuperDicq Colour me surprised.

Such kind of proprietary behavior is unfortunately typical of "open source" supporters, plus it seems that they can't even decide if it means source-available or the 10 definitions from the "OSI" (or have even heard of such).

It seems that the natural meaning is the one that's understood in practice, but only in the most proprietary of ways.


This is why I'm proud to be a free software supporter - no free software supporter who knows that free means freedom will ever call software that they know is proprietary, free software.