Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.online/users/CryogenicIce9/statuses/111125287478449937">Nicola (cryogenicice9@mastodon.online)'s status on Monday, 25-Sep-2023 19:51:07 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.online/@CryogenicIce9" title="cryogenicice9@mastodon.online"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="Nicola" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Nicola</a><div><a href="https://tilde.zone/@mhd/111125160580511785" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/93353" title="colman@mastodon.ie">Colman Reilly</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://tilde.zone/@mhd">@mhd</a> <a href="https://mastodon.ie/@Colman">@Colman</a> @goatsarah@thegoatery.dynds.org </p><p>The 'disposable' digital cameras you can get are probably cheaper and better quality than anything you'd get cobbling together a retro-film camera solution. Cobbling together something to reuse pre-digital cameras is somewhat pointless, you end up spending a fortune engineering around the focal depth issue and getting the sensor as thin and towards the front of whatever solution you do, that it becomes prohibitively expensive. 1/2</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/2100279#notice-4125008">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-09-25T19:51:07+09:00" title="Monday, 25-Sep-2023 19:51:07 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.online/@CryogenicIce9/111125287478449937" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.online via ActivityPub">mastodon.online</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.online/@CryogenicIce9/111125287478449937">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Nicola (cryogenicice9@mastodon.online)'s status on Monday, 25-Sep-2023 19:51:07 JSTNicola
in reply to
- mhd
- Colman Reilly
@mhd @Colman @goatsarah@thegoatery.dynds.org
The 'disposable' digital cameras you can get are probably cheaper and better quality than anything you'd get cobbling together a retro-film camera solution. Cobbling together something to reuse pre-digital cameras is somewhat pointless, you end up spending a fortune engineering around the focal depth issue and getting the sensor as thin and towards the front of whatever solution you do, that it becomes prohibitively expensive. 1/2
In conversationabout a year ago from mastodon.onlinepermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice