Here’s your original argument: >It was half a shitpost, but I have a disdain for Gnosticism in general. Truths aren’t revealed in private. They are known or made so. And they are lasting.
Whether or not you’re using the capital T Truth or just regular old truth without the capitalization is ambiguous because you used that word at the beginning of the sentence. You were corrected on this point that truths are never revealed in private. They are, at least according to mainstream scripture. Your attempt at coping was that you meant to use the capital T version, but that was only made after the fact.
Because you used the word “disdain” in this context, you were given a parsimonious interpretation of the facts, a parsimonious interpretation you’re essentially bound by. It’s not my fault your argument is shit.
Should I give you another opportunity to admit you were wrong and only take a little l? Or do you prefer your permanent, big L, and me just muting you, discarding your opinion permanently?