@lanodan and don't get me wrong, the original use of lektor may have started due to costs in gommie times but after system transformation, people have repeatedly expressed their preference for this form over dubs.
For me, it's a medium balancing the conveyance of translated meaning read by a well-speaking professional with the original performance still being heard underneath (which includes acting and emotions). Dubs most of the time fail at both of these points.
Subs still are better though :JahySmug: