Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.coop/users/mike_hales/statuses/110842633326136124">mike_hales 💔*!?¿* (mike_hales@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 07-Aug-2023 00:47:44 JST</a><a href="https://social.coop/@mike_hales" title="mike_hales@social.coop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/7521-48-20230730203656.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="mike_hales 💔*!?¿*" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">mike_hales 💔*!?¿*</a><div><a href="https://social.coop/@bhaugen/110842565447370123" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/31102" title="band@octodon.social">band</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/155563" title="lynnfoster@social.coop">Lynn Foster</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/157766" title="ckohtala@social.coop">ckohtala</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://social.coop/@bhaugen">@bhaugen</a> <br>WAY back, I recall a debate involving Mike Robinson, around The Coordinator, including a paper in an early CSCW journal, early 90s. I think he argues for provision for 'second level language' - basically an escape from the rule-organised Winogradian channel of conversations for action, into a free-text free-flow channel.</p><p>Haven't got that 🙄 All I do have is a working paper on 'representations' by Liam Bannon &amp; him, from ECSCW'91<br><a href="https://owncube.cloud/index.php/s/KQoKrc9EBJmT9YL" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://owncube.cloud/index.php/s/KQoKrc9EBJmT9YL</a><br>1of2<br><a href="https://social.coop/@ckohtala">@ckohtala</a> <a href="https://social.coop/@lynnfoster">@lynnfoster</a> <a href="https://octodon.social/@band">@band</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/1913685#notice-3755712">In conversation</a><time datetime="2023-08-07T00:47:44+09:00" title="Monday, 07-Aug-2023 00:47:44 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.coop/@mike_hales/110842633326136124" rel="external" title="Sent from social.coop via ActivityPub">social.coop</a></span></span><a href="https://social.coop/@mike_hales/110842633326136124">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: owncube.cloud</div><h5><a href="https://owncube.cloud/index.php/s/KQoKrc9EBJmT9YL">bannon robinson 1991 q representations.pdf</a></h5><div></div></header><div>OwnCube - Open Source Hosting since 2012</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
mike_hales 💔*!?¿* (mike_hales@social.coop)'s status on Monday, 07-Aug-2023 00:47:44 JSTmike_hales 💔*!?¿*
in reply to
@bhaugen
WAY back, I recall a debate involving Mike Robinson, around The Coordinator, including a paper in an early CSCW journal, early 90s. I think he argues for provision for 'second level language' - basically an escape from the rule-organised Winogradian channel of conversations for action, into a free-text free-flow channel.
Haven't got that 🙄 All I do have is a working paper on 'representations' by Liam Bannon & him, from ECSCW'91
https://owncube.cloud/index.php/s/KQoKrc9EBJmT9YL
1of2
@ckohtala @lynnfoster @band
In conversationabout a year ago from social.cooppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: owncube.cloud
  bannon robinson 1991 q representations.pdf
  OwnCube - Open Source Hosting since 2012

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice