Embed Notice

I am seriously mental, but, in this instance, I’m correct

You haven’t really provided an argument. I think Humphie has some errors in his logic: being gay doesn’t mean you have to have sex with men. You just have to be sexually attracted to men. You can have that as a man (real man) and not fuck dudes and still be a homosexual (you’re just not acting on it, or “out”).

Now, can sexual attraction be immoral? You might say “they can’t help being attracted to men. We should punish them.” Okay, let’s go with that. Say you have a person who’s attracted to a 12 year old girl … and only 12 year old girls. Is that immoral? Well they can’t help being attracted to them. It’s not a strawman. It’s a legit argument.

Morality is about society creating limits on what feels good, to push culture into things that are of benefit/fitness. Why has homosexuality been considered wrong? They literally cannot reproduce. Society cannot grow with pure homosexuals.

Take some neurology classes, some psych classes

At this point in time, all science is this space is justification for a new moral behavior. Science is (and really, always has been) a religion. It gives birth to an ideology that satisfied some socialite fitness requirements at some time. We’ll see how these most recent moral beliefs and changes pan out. If you see the Middle East rise and the West continue to decline .. I mean there are a lot of factors, but you cannot rule out the “pride” in one’s sexuality as one of the contributing factors.