Embed Notice

One guy decided that if it was logical reasoning then it had to be language --even if it wasn't anything like spoken words or sign language, or math etc.

To him things like implications, isomorphism, etc. were language. To me they are "logical reasoning"

-- but, I'm getting far from my real point which is about LLMs.

I think a danger in seeing language as required for intelligence is the risk of seeing anything that uses language as intelligent.

2/