GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice

  1. Embed this notice
    Starsstorm ? (starsstorm@spinster.xyz)'s status on Friday, 05-May-2023 10:30:30 JSTStarsstorm ?Starsstorm ?
    in reply to
    • Seahorses are horses
    • Caffosaurus☕?:mayo:
    • LisbonMuse
    @Piss_Ant @Fullycaffeinated @LisbonMuse Camilla is technically Queen consort, but it seems will just be referred to as Queen like previous Queen consorts have been. Queen Elizabeth (Elizabeth II’s mother), Queen Mary, and Queen Alexandra were all Queen consorts for example. If Diana had lived and still been charles’ wife, she would have been Queen consort too. I believe there was discussion once that Camilla might take the title Princess consort , but Queen Elizabeth specified Camilla would be Queen consort last year?

    The comparable title for men is Prince consort from what I’ve gathered, although I think there has only been Prince Phillip and Prince Albert in the UK. It has to do with the way kings and queens have been traditionally viewed because a king outranks a queen, so a queen can’t be married to a king consort. A ruling Queen is technically a queen regnant not a Queen consort.

    Source: I’m lame and read too much about Queen Victoria and her daughters. I’m also American so I may have f’d up somewhere.
    In conversationFriday, 05-May-2023 10:30:30 JST from spinster.xyzpermalink
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.