@cyberspook Please consider asking questions.

>On the other hand, I don’t think that really applies to GNU/FSF.

With this as context:
> It's a folly to associate communities or organizations with one single person connected to them.
> A community is always a generalization, not an expression of the individual's motives and uniqueness. It's about consensus, ideological status-quo, spooks if you will.

Point being that GNU/FSF doesn't really cares about real consensus, Stallman typically represents what's at least the official position, where the individual positions end up getting quite lost.
Or did you forget how non-anarchist organisations work?