@lispi314 @munin i study cybernetics and i don't think you can quantify half of what you just said in that post.

"opportunity cost" alone is defined by the set of all alternative outcomes which potentially involves a whole P=NP shindig, which is the opposite of "easily."

complexity barely has any measurement metrics (and i've tried to find them); kolmogrov tried it (and its more of a theoretical device, since determining if some given kolmogrov complexity is truly the smallest is P=NP again), ashby tried it ("variety"), which is also somewhat theoretical because variety is counting up the number of state spaces to decide across which becomes very intractable.

consequentialism is one of *three* ancient ethical schools that disagree with each other.

"you are guilty of sin if you do not perform a maximum of 10 kolmogrovs to prevent a sin within 50,000 varieties of you" is technically definable but not actually applicable.