@Humpleupagus @shortstories WTF
"problem with scientific model is that it no longer looks for difference" NO, not at all., It seeks the truth through proposed theory, AND THEN TESTS IT AS IF IT WAS WRONG TO DISPROVE IT. There is NOTHING wrong with that. The ONLY problem is politics, power, church, state, USE that model, and SILENCE decent if it doesn't work for them. You are describing "scientific publications" and I strongly suggest you look at who owns them. I spent until I was 30 years old "studying in universities" in the 90s.. I know how "scientists" (in academics) "tune there research to get funding, and don't bring up conflicting evidence" because of funding risks. The problem is, SCIENCE and scientists can NOT survive cancel culture and present facts.

Point in fact.... Kary Mullis.

"Science" was compromised decades ago, (global warming), it's only now when people see culture, media, everything, was compromised the go "science too now" (especially post-Covid). Trust me, they took down the truth in scientific publications DECADES ago... It was one of the first steps (Aaron Swartz knew that, and died for it)