@mcc @datarama Honestly, yeah, I think WASM is as close to a permacomputing technology as I've seen get any kind of adoption. That is, the appeal of a lot of older processors from a permacomputing stance is that they're simple enough to reproduce or emulate, without needing to know a bunch of proprietary shit internal to how x86_64 processors get made.
But you don't need a physical processor for that? A well-defined and more-or-less stable VM works well, too?