GNU social JP
  • FAQ
  • Login
GNU social JPは日本のGNU socialサーバーです。
Usage/ToS/admin/test/Pleroma FE
  • Public

    • Public
    • Network
    • Groups
    • Featured
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Embed this notice
    lime with barcode (scanlime@misc.name)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 12:52:21 JST lime with barcode lime with barcode

    it's mildly infuriating that people are dismissing the different view of the network experienced by each server as a misfeature. i really like how the fediverse allows literally multiple perspectives to coexist. i like that my view of the thread isn't expected to be the same as the thread author's view.

    In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 12:52:21 JST from misc.name permalink
    • Embed this notice
      hypolite (hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 12:52:20 JST hypolite hypolite
      in reply to
      @scanlime Counterpoint: people getting several times the same reply from different people who did not see each other's reply. Then OP gets legitimately frustrated because they can see all these same replies.

      I don't think there's a good solution to this, but I also think it's a valid criticism, especially coming from platforms where everybody had a complete view of the conversation.
      In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 12:52:20 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      hypolite (hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:07:16 JST hypolite hypolite
      in reply to
      @scanlime I'm with you, I don't mind the limited vantage point (except in private scoped conversation where I received orphan replies from the OP because I don't follow the person they're replying to).

      Maybe it's just a scale issue. With followers in the hundreds, the drawbacks are less pronounced. With followers in the thousands and above, they become much more prominent because the number of different view of a single conversation also explodes.

      But then I expect trying to reconcile the view of the thread among all the involved servers would increase network traffic very significantly with a nasty side-effect: you know your provocative reply will be forwarded to all these people who do not follow you.

      This is why I'm against any technical solution to this frustration. The cost/benefit analysis doesn't look good.
      In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:07:16 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      lime with barcode (scanlime@misc.name)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:07:17 JST lime with barcode lime with barcode
      in reply to
      • hypolite

      @hypolite the OP can use filters, and people in general can get used to the world being bigger than a single place to stand. i'm not unaware of your perspective i just don't appreciate the implications of this approach.

      In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:07:17 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      hypolite (hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:11:04 JST hypolite hypolite
      in reply to
      @scanlime It is, and we implemented a button to revoke a follow in #Friendica that could be used just for that.
      In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:11:04 JST permalink
    • Embed this notice
      lime with barcode (scanlime@misc.name)'s status on Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:11:05 JST lime with barcode lime with barcode
      in reply to
      • hypolite

      @hypolite one solution is to not have so many followers

      In conversation Friday, 23-Dec-2022 13:11:05 JST permalink
      hypolite likes this.

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • TOS
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

GNU social JP is a social network, courtesy of GNU social JP管理人. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.2-dev, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All GNU social JP content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.