@utzer I know this isn’t what you asked about but I do think it’s time for Nitter to retire. It was always a crutch that I don’t believe the Fediverse needs anymore.
@nuron yes, of course the child abuse stuff collides with that, but there they only asked me to take the shit down. After that they informed me that generally a service like nitter is against their TOS. I will look for the email and share that info here.
@utzer Reproducing doesn't imply anything about altering it. Reproducing means you're publishing it yourself apart from the original publisher, whether it's the author themselves or a publishing company.
@hypolite@nuron yes and that is the thing, it might not be reproducing, it is an unaltered version, at least the content and it is available in its entirety. But I didn't want to discuss with them.
@hypolite@nuron Nitter (along with other similar frontends) believes (of course not tried in court) that their use is legal under various provisions for proxies as well as ToS's. See also https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/issues/482 and https://github.com/zedeus/nitter/wiki/DMCA-templates . That does not prevent people from sending DMCA takedowns regardless, and Hetzner will kick you off if there are too many DMCA takedowns (as long as they look valid?) against you (even if your use is legal).
@hypolite nope in my case it was not Twitter, there was no take down notice for copyright infringement, it was a mere coincidence, and then they said it violates some copyright. I think especially copyright infringement requires the owner of the rights to claim that you do cause an infringement, but Hetzner just said it is infringement without being harmed themselves.